See the $6.1B ‘safe’ muni mispricing everyone steps over
We reframe water risk—drought and litigation—into tradable probabilities. Bayesian updates, Markov regimes, SDE paths, and Monte Carlo converge on one simple trade: a $100M short with 85% confidence.
Lake Mead ChronoRisk Slider
2024–2030 simulated elevation decline with default risk and litigation overlays
Nebraska–Colorado lawsuit: 73.5% P(D | Lawsuit)
Tribal water rights litigation: 72.5% P(D | Litigation)
P(D|Event) = Σ_i P(D|H_i) P(H_i|Event)
Nebraska–Colorado: π ≈ [0.08, 0.42, 0.50]
Navajo: π ≈ [0.09, 0.43, 0.48]
P = [[0.2,0.6,0.2],[0.1,0.5,0.4],[0.05,0.3,0.65]]
CMF ETF default risk: 35% (Phase IV). Confidence: 85%.
dP_t = 0.05 P_t dt + 0.2 P_t dW_t
Trigger: Jul 16, 2025 filing: 1.3 MAF diversions; $1B+ litigation; $628M Perkins County Canal impact.
Impact: 73.5% disruption risk; 50% severe shortage π ≈ [0.08, 0.42, 0.50]; $174.6M expected loss.
Value: Real-time USGS (12.5 MAF), NAIWRS, NQH2O ($383–$1,000/AF).
Trigger: Navajo 44,700 AFY claims; 3.2 MAF tribal rights; $500M+ litigation.
Impact: 72.5% disruption risk; 48% severe shortage π ≈ [0.09, 0.43, 0.48]; $166.7M expected loss.
Value: Tracks SGMA (20% GSPs inadequate), USGS, NQH2O.